Efficiency Comparison: Air Source Heat Pump vs. Furnace

Comparing Efficiency: Air Source Heat Pump and Furnace Performance


Home heating systems play a pivotal role in ensuring comfort and well-being, especially in regions with harsh climates. As technology advances, homeowners are faced with choices between different heating solutions. This article aims to explore and compare the efficiency of two popular options: Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHP) and Furnaces.

Understanding Air Source Heat Pumps

Explanation of how Air Source Heat Pumps work

Air Source Heat Pumps operate on the principle of extracting heat from the outdoor air. This process involves a heat transfer mechanism and the subsequent distribution of heat within the home. The outdoor unit of the ASHP absorbs heat from the air, and the refrigerant within the system carries this heat indoors. Through a heat exchanger, the indoor unit releases the heat into the home.

Pros and cons of Air Source Heat Pumps

  • Energy efficiency: ASHPs are known for their high energy efficiency. They can provide more energy output than the electricity they consume, making them a sustainable choice.
  • Environmental impact: While ASHPs are generally environmentally friendly, the source of electricity powering them influences their overall impact. If powered by renewable energy sources, their carbon footprint can be significantly reduced.
  • Initial installation costs: The upfront costs of installing an ASHP can be higher than traditional heating systems, but this expense may be offset by long-term energy savings.
  • Long-term savings: ASHPs can result in long-term savings due to their energy efficiency, particularly in regions with moderate climates.

Exploring Furnaces

Overview of furnace operation

Furnaces operate by combustion, typically using natural gas, oil, or electricity. The combustion process generates heat, which is then distributed throughout the home via ducts or radiators.

Pros and cons of Furnaces

  • Energy efficiency: Furnaces have high energy efficiency, especially those with modern technology. High-efficiency models can convert most of the fuel into usable heat.
  • Environmental impact: The environmental impact of furnaces is contingent on the energy source. Gas and oil furnaces emit combustion byproducts, while electric furnaces have no on-site emissions.
  • Initial installation costs: Furnaces generally have lower initial installation costs compared to ASHPs, making them an attractive option for budget-conscious homeowners.
  • Long-term savings: While the operational costs of furnaces can be competitive, their long-term savings may be affected by fluctuating fuel prices.

Efficiency Metrics Comparison

Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER) for Air Source Heat Pumps

  • Explanation of SEER and its significance: SEER measures the efficiency of cooling systems, indicating how much cooling a system can provide per unit of energy consumed.
  • Typical SEER ratings for Air Source Heat Pumps: ASHPs typically have SEER ratings ranging from 14 to 22, with higher ratings representing increased efficiency.

Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency (AFUE) for Furnaces

  • Explanation of AFUE and its significance: AFUE measures the efficiency of combustion heating systems, indicating the percentage of fuel that is converted into usable heat.
  • Typical AFUE ratings for Furnaces: Modern high-efficiency furnaces can have AFUE ratings exceeding 90%, ensuring effective fuel utilization.

Climate Considerations

Impact of climate on Air Source Heat Pump performance

  • Cold weather challenges: ASHPs may experience reduced efficiency in extremely cold climates, necessitating supplemental heating.
  • Geographical suitability: ASHPs are well-suited for regions with moderate climates, where the outdoor air temperature rarely reaches extremes.

Furnace performance in different climates

  • Adaptability to extreme temperatures: Furnaces are generally more adaptable to extreme temperatures and can provide consistent heating in colder climates.
  • Geographical considerations: Furnaces may be a preferred choice in regions with harsh winters, where the ability to generate high levels of heat quickly is crucial.

Environmental Impact

Carbon footprint of Air Source Heat Pumps

  • Electricity source considerations: The environmental impact of ASHPs is closely tied to the source of electricity. Utilizing renewable energy sources can significantly reduce their carbon footprint.
  • Refrigerant choices and environmental impact: The type of refrigerant used in ASHPs can impact their environmental sustainability. Some refrigerants have a lower global warming potential than others.

Environmental impact of Furnaces

  • Combustion byproducts and emissions: Gas and oil furnaces emit combustion byproducts, contributing to air pollution. Regular maintenance and modern technology can mitigate these emissions.
  • Energy source considerations: The choice of fuel for furnaces, whether natural gas, oil, or electricity, affects their environmental impact.

Installation Costs and Maintenance

Initial installation costs of Air Source Heat Pumps

  • Equipment and labor expenses: ASHPs generally have higher upfront costs due to the complexity of the system and the need for both indoor and outdoor units.
  • Potential government incentives: Some governments offer incentives, rebates, or tax credits for installing energy-efficient heating systems, which can offset initial costs.

Initial installation costs of Furnaces

  • Equipment and labor expenses: Furnaces typically have lower upfront costs, making them a more accessible option for homeowners on a budget.
  • Potential government incentives: Similar to ASHPs, furnaces may be eligible for government incentives, depending on the region and the system’s efficiency.

Maintenance requirements for both systems

  • Regular maintenance tasks: Both ASHPs and furnaces require regular maintenance to ensure optimal performance and longevity. Tasks include filter replacement, system inspections, and cleaning.
  • Lifespan considerations: Proper maintenance can extend the lifespan of both ASHPs and furnaces, with well-maintained systems lasting longer and operating more efficiently.

Long-Term Savings and Return on Investment

Calculating long-term savings for Air Source Heat Pumps

  • Energy cost savings over time: ASHPs can lead to significant energy cost savings over the system’s lifespan, particularly in regions with moderate climates.
  • Factor in maintenance costs: While ASHPs generally have lower maintenance costs than furnaces, factoring in these costs is essential for an accurate assessment of long-term savings.

Calculating long-term savings for Furnaces

  • Energy cost savings over time: Furnaces can also provide long-term energy cost savings, especially with the installation of high-efficiency models.
  • Factor in maintenance costs: Maintenance costs for furnaces may vary based on the type of system and fuel source, influencing the overall long-term savings.


In conclusion, the comparison between Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHP) and Furnaces underscores the importance of a tailored approach to home heating solutions. The nuanced analysis of efficiency metrics, environmental impact, and real-life examples provides a comprehensive guide for homeowners. As you contemplate your heating system choice, consider your local climate, budget, and sustainability goals. Explore government incentives and resources to make an informed decision that aligns with your values. Whether opting for the eco-friendly innovation of ASHPs or the reliability of furnaces, take the next step towards a more energy-efficient home. 


Evaluate your unique needs, consult with professionals, and embark on a journey towards a comfortable, cost-effective, and environmentally conscious heating solution. Your choice today contributes not only to your immediate comfort but also to a sustainable and resilient future. Call now to make a difference in your home’s efficiency and environmental impact.



How efficient is a furnace compared to a heat pump?

Furnaces are highly efficient, typically boasting AFUE ratings of over 90%. Heat pumps, including air source heat pumps, can achieve even higher efficiency, with Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratios (SEER) ranging from 14 to 22.

Are air source heat pumps cheaper to run than gas central heating?

Yes, air source heat pumps are generally cheaper to run than gas central heating. They can deliver more energy output than the electricity they consume, resulting in cost savings over time.

How much more efficient is an air source heat pump?

Air source heat pumps are significantly more efficient than traditional heating methods. With SEER ratings ranging from 14 to 22, they can provide efficient heating while consuming less energy.

Are heat pumps really 300% efficient?

Yes, heat pumps can be highly efficient, often reaching a coefficient of performance (COP) greater than 3. This means they can produce three units of heat for every unit of electricity consumed, making them an energy-efficient heating option.

Posted in